← All briefings

This Week in FI Loyalty

Loyalty moves closer to core financial behavior.

Community commerce, deposit-linked cashback, and card-conversion incentives are tying loyalty to the banking behaviors leaders actually want to grow.

This week's theme

Loyalty works harder when it is tied to a financial behavior the institution actually wants to grow. That is what connects this week's three developments. Reseda and Goodbuy are using community rewards to bring members, local businesses, and the credit union into the same value exchange. Rogue is letting members move cashback into deposits. Leaders is rewarding the steps that help a card migration land successfully.

What I like about these examples is that the reward is not sitting off to the side. It is connected to card use, deposits, digital adoption, and relationship growth. That is the opportunity. But let's be clear: these are directionally useful ideas, not proof of incremental growth or positive program economics. We still need the results.

01

Lead development

Reseda and Goodbuy connect community rewards to small-business and member growth

What changed

Reseda Group announced an investment in Goodbuy, a community-commerce platform designed for credit unions. Goodbuy provides a white-label marketplace where credit union members can discover offers from participating local businesses. The companies position the platform as a way for credit unions to support local merchants while strengthening both consumer and small-business relationships.

Why it matters

Credit unions frequently position community connection as a competitive advantage, but that promise can be difficult for members to experience through everyday banking. A community-rewards marketplace could make the idea more tangible by creating a two-sided value exchange for members, participating businesses, and the credit union. The important development is the attempt to use community commerce as part of the credit union's relationship-growth strategy.

Growth and loyalty implications

If the platform can attract relevant merchants and generate meaningful member participation, it could potentially support small-business acquisition and engagement, consumer card usage, small-business deposit growth, greater visibility of the credit union's community role, and stronger differentiation. These are potential outcomes, not verified results.

What leaders should consider

Credit unions evaluating community rewards should begin with the value exchange and economics, not the marketplace itself. The member offer has to be relevant, merchants need a credible reason to participate, and the credit union needs enough local density to make the experience useful. Leaders should be realistic about merchant recruitment, offer funding, operating ownership, attribution complexity, and the tradeoff between visible community support and a program that can sustain itself.

Evidence and limitations

No adoption, transaction, deposit, retention, or return-on-investment evidence was publicly available when the analysis was approved.

Source: Reseda Group via PR Newswire β†—
Open the permanent insight β†’

Executive Action

Take this into the meeting room.

Decision this could influence

Whether to launch or expand community rewards as a measurable growth program connecting member card activity with small-business relationships, rather than treating it as a local-offers directory.

Teams that should care

  • Marketing
  • Cards
  • Deposits
  • Product
  • Analytics

Question to take to the team

If we launch a community rewards marketplace, what member and merchant behavior would prove it is creating incremental card spend and small-business relationships rather than shifting activity we already have?

What I would test

I would start in one defined market with a focused member cohort and a small group of relevant merchants. I would compare attributed spend and relationship activity with a suitable comparison group before expanding the merchant network or offer budget.

How I would measure it

  • Active-member use of participating merchant offers
  • Incremental card spend at participating merchants versus a comparison group
  • New small-business deposit relationships and balances tied to participating merchants
  • Merchant activation and retention
  • Net program cost per incremental member or merchant relationship

What would change my view

Stronger signals
  • My view would strengthen if participating members generate attributable incremental spend, merchants open or deepen credit union relationships, and the strongest merchants stay active at sustainable economics.
Weaker signals
  • My view would weaken if offer use stays shallow, spend does not improve after accounting for seasonality and selection, merchants churn, or the cost of building local density outweighs the relationship value created.
02

United States

Rogue Credit Union launches cashback that can flow back into deposits

What changed

Rogue Credit Union introduced a Visa Signature Rewards card offering 4% cashback on dining, 3% on fuel and electric-vehicle charging, 2% on groceries, and 1% on other purchases. Cardholders can apply cashback as a statement credit or deposit it into a Rogue checking, savings, or Ownership Account. The card has no annual fee, balance-transfer fee, or cash-advance fee. Rogue states that the rewards became effective August 22, 2026.

Why it matters

The earn rates make the card competitive, but the more strategically interesting feature is the range of redemption destinations. Allowing members to move cashback into a deposit account can connect card spending with savings and broader relationship value. The availability of this option does not mean members will use it. Its impact will depend on how Rogue presents the choice and how attractive members find the different destinations.

Growth and loyalty implications

The product could potentially support increased card acquisition and usage, greater share of everyday spending, increased awareness and use of Rogue deposit accounts, more interaction across cards, checking, and savings, and stronger perceived relationship value. The deposit-redemption feature will matter commercially only if members select it and retain the funds.

What leaders should consider

Deposit redemption creates a tighter connection between card rewards and the broader relationship, but it is only strategically useful if members value the choice and the institution gains something incremental. Leaders should weigh member flexibility, the funding value of retained balances, possible cannibalization of cash members would have deposited anyway, and the operating and accounting complexity of moving rewards across products.

Evidence and limitations

No public evidence currently demonstrates adoption, incremental spending, deposit retention, or program economics.

Source: Rogue Credit Union β†—
Open the permanent insight β†’

Executive Action

Take this into the meeting room.

Decision this could influence

Whether to use rewards redemption to move cashback into deposits and deepen the relationship, rather than treating cashback as a stand-alone card benefit.

Teams that should care

  • Cards
  • Deposits
  • Product
  • Analytics
  • Finance

Question to take to the team

If members can direct cashback into deposits, what would have to be true for that choice to create incremental balances and card usage instead of simply moving money we would have returned anyway?

What I would test

I would start with a defined cardholder cohort and make the deposit option more prominent for part of the group. Then I would compare redemption destination, retained balances, and card usage against members receiving the standard redemption experience.

How I would measure it

  • Share of cashback directed into deposits
  • Reward balance retained after 30, 60, and 90 days
  • Incremental purchase volume compared with a suitable comparison group
  • Change in products per member or relationship depth
  • Net program cost per incremental dollar of balance or spend

What would change my view

Stronger signals
  • My view would strengthen if members select deposit redemption, retain the funds, and subsequently increase card usage or broader product adoption relative to comparable cardholders.
Weaker signals
  • My view would weaken if members rarely select the option, withdraw the funds quickly, or show no meaningful improvement in card usage, balances, or relationship depth after accounting for selection effects.
03

United States

Leaders turns a required card migration into a three-action engagement campaign

What changed

Leaders Credit Union scheduled the transition of its credit-card portfolio from Visa to Mastercard for August 24. Members must activate a replacement card and update digital wallets and recurring payments. Card controls are moving into the primary Leaders CU app, existing rewards points will transfer, and rewards redemption is unavailable from August 19 through October 1 while earning continues. Leaders also created a sweepstakes running from August 24 through September 30. Members who activate the new card, add it to a digital wallet, and enroll in electronic statements are entered for a chance to win $1,000.

Why it matters

A required card conversion creates disruption. Members must take action, and every incomplete step can lead to service calls, interrupted transactions, or lost card usage. Leaders is using the migration to encourage three measurable behaviors tied to a successful digital relationship: card activation, digital-wallet provisioning, and electronic-statement enrollment. The incentive is therefore attached to operationally and commercially relevant actions, rather than generic engagement.

Growth and loyalty implications

If executed well, the campaign could support faster replacement-card activation, reduced loss of card usage during migration, increased digital-wallet adoption, greater electronic-statement enrollment, increased use of the primary mobile app, and a smoother transition into the new card experience. Sweepstakes entry does not guarantee sustained card usage. Completing the actions may establish the relationship, but ongoing value and communication will determine whether the card remains active.

What leaders should consider

The first priority in a card migration should remain failure prevention. The three-action requirement can make the completion event more valuable, but every added requirement creates friction and another place for a member to get stuck. Leaders also has to balance incentive cost, clear sweepstakes terms, equitable access for members who do not use a digital wallet, and enough support to keep a necessary migration from feeling like a promotion members have to navigate.

Evidence and limitations

No outcome data was available when the analysis was approved. The development should remain described as scheduled until completion is verified.

Source: Leaders Credit Union β†—
Open the permanent insight β†’

Executive Action

Take this into the meeting room.

Decision this could influence

Whether to use an incentive during a required card migration to accelerate the actions that protect card usage and digital adoption, without adding more friction to an already disruptive change.

Teams that should care

  • Cards
  • Digital
  • Marketing
  • Analytics
  • Risk and Compliance

Question to take to the team

Which migration actions are important enough to reward, and how much incremental completion would we need for the incentive to justify the added cost and friction?

What I would test

I would start with a phased cohort design. Give one group the standard migration experience and another the same service support plus the three-action incentive, then compare completion and post-migration card activity while watching closely for service failures or member confusion.

How I would measure it

  • Replacement-card activation rate and time to activation
  • Digital-wallet provisioning rate
  • Electronic-statement enrollment rate
  • Purchase rate and volume 30, 60, and 90 days after migration
  • Service contacts and failed transactions during the migration

What would change my view

Stronger signals
  • My view would strengthen if the incentive produces a meaningful lift in all three actions, card usage remains higher after the sweepstakes ends, and service contacts or failed transactions do not increase.
Weaker signals
  • My view would weaken if the extra requirements cause drop-off or confusion, completion improves only marginally, or the apparent lift disappears once the incentive ends.

What to watch

Signals that will determine whether the strategy is working

Goodbuy's evidence of incrementality

Watch for participating credit unions, merchant adoption, active-member usage, transaction attribution, small-business account growth, deposit growth, and merchant retention.

Rogue's redemption behavior

Watch how many members choose a deposit destination, where the funds go, how long they remain, and whether the behavior is associated with increased card usage or broader product adoption.

Leaders' post-migration activation

Watch completion rates for activation, digital-wallet provisioning, and electronic-statement enrollment, followed by sustained card activity after the sweepstakes ends.

Wealthsimple's choice-based milestone rewards

Wealthsimple added a 12-month Globe and Mail digital subscription as an option within its milestone-rewards program. The individual addition is not significant enough for a featured development, but the broader model remains worth watching because it connects customer-selected benefits to asset consolidation and relationship milestones.

Supporting source 1 β†—Supporting source 2 β†—

Supporting market context

United States

Credit union lending accelerated in June

U.S. credit union loans outstanding increased 1.22% in June. Credit-card balances increased 1%, while unsecured personal loans increased 3.39%. The estimates use an anonymized Equifax sample covering approximately 10% of U.S. consumers with Social Security numbers.

This provides context for competition around lending relationships and card usage. It does not demonstrate that loyalty programs caused the growth.

Source: America's Credit Unions β†—
Canada

Vancity reports greater capacity to invest in member experience

Vancity reported $70.6 million in year-to-date net income before distributions and taxes, with both loans and deposits reaching $27.1 billion. The credit union also reported continued investment in digital banking, branches, and member experience.

Stronger financial performance can create capacity for customer-experience and engagement investment. Vancity's announcement does not attribute its financial results to loyalty initiatives.

Source: Vancity β†—